The Thin "Red Line"

Sort of reminds me of the good old George Bush days, when everyone agreed with his administration and the fact that Saddam Hussein DID have Weapons of Mass Destruction. Just about every Democratic Politician in office including Hillary and Bill Clinton, John Kerry and Ted Kennedy wanted to go ahead and Invade Iraq.
Saddam Hussein had been engaged in the development of weapons of Mass Destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the UN who wanted to send in inspectors.
Without question, we needed to disarm Saddam Hussein. He was a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presented a threat not only to his own people but to te rest of the world.
Now, Here We Go Again!  Now Chuck Hagel and the CIA with varying levels of confidence say they have proof of chemical weapons by Syria. Do you believe this, and could it be possible the so called Freedom Fighters released these to draw the U.S. into fighting another Muslim Brotherhood war for them? By the way all those who pose that there never were chemical weapons in Iraq, is it possible they crossed the boarder from Iraq some time during the night before we entered? Hagel is hanging the blame on the Assad regime, but who’s to say with these people. They are even more untrustworthy than our own elected officials. Hagel said he would have to ask Obama what to do. He really looked silly during this press briefing. Now we will find out!!! War Drum Role please. The White House says Syria’s Chemical Weapons Evidence is not “Airtight” and we need more evidence.  As if 70,000 dead bodies is not enough evidence.  So our dear Leader wants to draw a “Red Line” And Obama has said the use of chemical weapons would be a “game-changer” .
So were are we today? Could you imagine invading a Nation based on suspicions? Hell 70,000 dead bodies isn’t really proof of anything. It could be from an outbreak of Mad Cow disease, or a possible outbreak of West Nile Virus, after all they are near the Nile!
So, lets see now, how many more reports and deaths is good enough for Obama to call it “Evidence”? Another 70,000? The evidence appears to be strong but not necessarily exactly conclusive.

Look, I’m not saying that we should get involved or that we should or shouldn't intervene, but I am saying that if Obama is going to draw any “Red Lines” then he must show that he means what he says or else he is showing the whole world that we are Full of Crap and that we are really weaklings with a big mouth. Words are cheap.

 Why should terrorism change? It has been working so well against America.  Look at the facts, they have killed hundreds, and thousands of Americans and we have killed what, 10 or 12 of them at best.  Look at the Twin Towers attack, the Boston Marathon bombing. The have our leaders and our people are terrified. The terrorists have won.
While we sit around and argue over Gun Control and Planned Parenthood, or Gay Marriage, and banning this and that and banning Soda or Salt,  they are building bombs to kill us. What’s next, banning the pressure cookers. Pressure cookers don't kill people...people kill people, and Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.
This Political Correctness is absolutely the stupidest thing I've ever heard.  I’m just waiting for Chuck Schumer to have a Sunday news conference to suggest Background checks  be required for any pressure cooker purchase.

While we sit around and wait for The PIAPS to answers the real questions on the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, we are getting the shit kicked out of us.
And now Our Leader in Cheat is drawing Ted Lines in the Sand over Syria. Is the any end to this madness known as the Obama Administration?
But not to worry, if Syria crosses that “Red Line” Obammy will draw a new line.